Skip to main content
ISWAN SeafarerHelp +44 800 012 1004 · free, 24/7, multilingualmore ▾
Skip to content
Seafarer Index

Alternative fuels — the IMO transition path

What's replacing heavy fuel oil — LNG, methanol, ammonia, hydrogen, biofuels — and what each one means for engine room work, training, and safety culture onboard.

What it is

The shift away from heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine gas oil (MGO) toward lower- and zero-carbon alternatives. The IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee's 2023 GHG Strategy commits the industry to net-zero around 2050 with interim 2030 + 2040 checkpoints. Order-book data shows methanol-fuelled containerships + LNG-dual-fuel tankers as the dominant new-build choices through 2030, with ammonia + hydrogen still mostly in pilots.

Why it matters

Engineers + ETOs face fundamentally different cargo + fuel systems than the HFO fleet they trained on. Deck officers face new bunkering procedures + emergency response. Every fuel transition adds new STCW endorsements + competency requirements.

Where it stands in 2026

LNG: ~700+ in service, ~500+ on order. Methanol: ~50 in service, ~250+ on order (Maersk dominant). Ammonia: <10 pilots in service, ~200 on order, first commercial deliveries 2026–2027. Hydrogen: small short-sea pilots only. Biofuels: blending up to 30% with conventional fuel without engine modification, increasing share on container + bulker fleets.

Training implications

Safety risks

Career angles

Common misunderstandings

Related

Primary sources

High confidence

Last verified