Skip to main content
ISWAN SeafarerHelp +44 800 012 1004 · free, 24/7, multilingualmore ▾
Skip to content
Seafarer Index

ITF Uniform TCC vs IBF Framework vs national flag CBA — which applies?

The three CBA frameworks that determine seafarer wages worldwide — ITF Uniform TCC, IBF Framework Agreement, and national flag-state CBAs. Which framework applies to your contract, and how the wage floors compare.

Side-by-side

Criterion
ITF Uniform TCC
The FoC-vessel wage floor.
IBF Framework
The bilateral CBA between ITF + IMEC.
National flag CBA
Domestic-flag agreements (US SIU, UK Nautilus, Greek NAT, etc.).
Negotiating partiesITF unilateral (with FoC-vessel operators)ITF + IMEC bilateralNational union + shipowner group
Coverage (approx)FoC vessels globally~14,000 vessels (IMEC members)National-flag fleets only
AB rating monthly wage (2025 indicative)$1,800$2,000US $6,500 / UK £3,500 / Norwegian NOK 45,000
Master monthly wage (2025 indicative)$8,000$10,000+US $18,000 / UK £14,000 / Norwegian NOK 165,000
CurrencyUSDUSDNational currency
Enforcement routeITF inspector at portIBF Framework grievance procedureNational union + labour court

Who each suits

Pros and cons

ITF Uniform TCC
Pros
  • Global floor.
  • ITF inspector direct-enforcement.
  • Standard structure across FoC fleet.
Cons
  • Lower absolute wages than IBF or national CBAs.
  • USD-based limits foreign-exchange upside.
IBF Framework
Pros
  • 10-15% premium above ITF TCC.
  • IBF Green Book onboard = clear terms.
  • Bilateral grievance procedure.
Cons
  • Only IMEC-member vessels covered.
  • Limited to certain shipowner segments.
National flag CBA
Pros
  • Substantially higher wages than TCC/IBF.
  • National labour law protection.
  • Full pension access.
Cons
  • Restricted to national citizens.
  • Higher domestic tax burden usually.

Common misunderstandings

Related

High confidence

Last verified