Skip to main content
ISWAN SeafarerHelp +44 800 012 1004 · free, 24/7, multilingualmore ▾
Skip to content
Seafarer Index

MLC vs STCW vs SOLAS

The three big maritime conventions every seafarer needs to know — and what each one actually covers. Crew labour, training + certification, and ship safety.

Side-by-side

Criterion
MLC 2006
Maritime Labour Convention — the 'seafarer's bill of rights'
STCW
Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping
SOLAS
Safety of Life at Sea — the umbrella ship-safety code
Adopted byILO (International Labour Organization)IMO (International Maritime Organization)IMO
Year first adopted2006 (in force 2013)1978 (heavily amended 1995, 2010 Manila, 2024)1974 (current consolidated text)
Who it protects / regulatesThe seafarer (employment + welfare)The seafarer (competence + certification)The ship + everyone on board
Headline topicsSEA, wages, hours of work + rest, repatriation, accommodation, food, medical care, financial security, complaintsCoC, CoP, BST, refreshers, watchkeeping, country-of-issue recognition, flag endorsementConstruction, fire, lifesaving, GMDSS, navigation, ISM + ISPS Codes, polar code, IMSBC code, IGC code
Enforced byFlag state (Reg 5.1) + port state (Reg 5.2)Flag state (Reg I/4) + port state (MoUs)Flag state + classification society + port state (MoUs)
Seafarer complaint routeOnboard procedure (A5.1.5) → flag state → port state (A5.2.2)Through flag-state CoC issuer + port state during PSCThrough ISM Designated Person Ashore + flag state
What goes wrong if it's violatedUnpaid wages, abandonment, denied repatriation, unsafe accommodation, hour-of-rest abuseSailing on expired CoC, fake STCW courses, inadequate competence onboardLifesaving / firefighting deficiencies, watertight integrity failure, GMDSS failure, PSC detention

Who each suits

Pros and cons

MLC 2006
Pros
  • Comprehensive coverage of labour rights — the most seafarer-protective instrument ever adopted.
  • Port-state complaint route (A5.2.2) gives seafarers a remedy in any ratifying port.
  • Financial-security amendments (2014) make abandonment compensation enforceable.
Cons
  • Enforcement varies wildly by flag state.
  • Onboard complaint procedure (A5.1.5) only works where the master is engaged.
  • Some flags ratified the convention but don't actively enforce it.
STCW
Pros
  • Sets a true global baseline — your CoC is recognisable everywhere the convention is in force.
  • Refresher cycles (2010 Manila Amendments) catch up with technology + fatigue research.
  • White List makes fake courses easier to detect.
Cons
  • Flag-state interpretation of recognition rules varies.
  • Refresher costs fall on the seafarer in practice on many fleets.
  • Fake course providers persist, especially in unregulated training markets.
SOLAS
Pros
  • Most comprehensive ship-safety regime in the world.
  • Backed by classification societies + port-state inspections.
  • Continually updated — Polar Code, IMSBC, IGF, cyber-risk amendments.
Cons
  • Compliance burden falls disproportionately on smaller operators.
  • Some subsidiary codes (IMSBC Group A) need stronger enforcement than they get.

Common misunderstandings

FAQ

If only one of the three applied to me, which would be most useful?
Depends on the problem. For a wage / contract / repatriation dispute → MLC. For a certificate / refresher question → STCW. For a ship-safety question → SOLAS. In practice all three apply on every commercial vessel and you'll touch all three across a contract.
Which one gives me the right to refuse to sail?
Multiple. SOLAS (Reg V/34) + ISM (Element 5) give the Master ultimate authority on safety. MLC A5.1.5 covers onboard complaints including refusal to work in unsafe conditions. STCW VIII includes fitness-for-duty (rest hours) as a sailing prerequisite. The strongest combination is to invoke MLC + ISM together for a wage + safety issue.

Related

Primary sources

High confidence

Last verified