🇸🇷 Suriname
ISO SUR / SR
Regulatory
- MLC 2006
- not-ratified
- Paris MoU rating
- unknown
- Tokyo MoU rating
- unknown
- USCG Qualship 21
- not listed
- ITF FoC
- not listed
Registry
- Vessel count
- —
- Deadweight
- —
- Administration
- Maritime Authority of Suriname
- File a complaint
- —
Compliance history
- Tokyo MoU
This page could not be found. Maybe try a search?
ページが見つかりませんでした - Tokyo MOU - ILO NORMLEX
ILO is a United Nations Agency
Ratifications of ILO conventions: Ratifications for
Country context
- Population
- 639,850 (2025)
- GDP per capita
- $7,070 (2025)
- Income group
- Upper middle income
- Region
- Latin America & Caribbean
Source: World Bank Open Data.
What this means for seafarers
- MLC 2006: This flag has not ratified MLC 2006. Port-state-control inspections still apply at MLC ports under "no more favourable treatment", but the flag itself issues no MLC certificate.
- Port-state-control profile: not-listed or unknown rating. Read about PSC regimes →
- STCW: Party to STCW. Verify a CoC issued under this flag at the administration.
See also: flag risk explained · MLC ratification list · white/grey/black lists.
Reference
- III Code — the IMO flag-state audit scheme measuring implementation of IMO instruments.
- Port state control — how Suriname-flagged ships are inspected + detained in foreign ports.
- Minimum safe manning — the SOLAS V/14 basis for Suriname's manning documents.
- Marine cyber incidents — case studies + the IACS UR E26/E27 cyber-resilience regime.
Ports in Suriname
Suriname flag: FAQ
- Is the Suriname flag safe for seafarers?
- The Suriname flag has weaker port-state-control ratings under one or both MoU regimes. It has not ratified MLC 2006, so MLC-based complaint routes are not directly available. Operators on weaker-rated flags are not always poor employers, but they face less external regulatory pressure.
- Has Suriname ratified the Maritime Labour Convention (MLC 2006)?
- No — Suriname has not ratified MLC 2006 as of the last update of this directory. Seafarers on Suriname-flagged vessels still benefit from MLC indirectly when calling at MLC-ratified ports (port state may inspect the vessel) but cannot lodge a direct convention-based complaint against the flag administration.
- How do I file a complaint against a Suriname-flagged vessel or operator?
- Complaints can be lodged with the Maritime Authority of Suriname. Without MLC ratification, the principal route is direct to the flag administration. The ITF and seafarer welfare organisations may still be able to help with operator-level disputes. Keep contract, wage records, and seaman's book ready.
- What port-state-control rating does Suriname have?
- Paris MoU rating: unknown. Tokyo MoU rating: unknown. PSC ratings classify flags by inspection and detention history. White / low-risk flags face fewer PSC inspections; black / high-risk flags face more frequent inspection and a higher detention rate.
- Is Suriname on the ITF Flag of Convenience (FoC) list?
- No — Suriname is not currently on the ITF Flag of Convenience list. Seafarers retain general ITF-channel access for advocacy and abandonment response regardless of FoC status.
Compare Suriname with another flag
Put two or three flags side-by-side on the comparison tool.
Compare →High confidence
Editorial confidence: how we grade. Data sources and methodology: /sources.